I haven't had a "Why, oh why" moment for ages. In fact the last one was ten years ago [and jolly good it was too: Ed] but nothing ever vanishes completely here at Ramblings, they just hibernate in the big filing cabinet which I really must get around to dusting some time.
Last night BBC1 screened episode 10 of the 19th series of The Apprentice. Mrs C. and I have watched it since the beginning. It might have been episode one of the very first series. Almost nothing has changed. Yes, the prize is now an investment in one's business rather than a "job" with Lord Sugar, yes the "trusted advisors" have changed and there is a far greater emphasis on designing, branding and pitching to "industry professionals", rather than tasks that engage directly with the public, but we still have a handful of people doing utterly unrealistic things that can only be done because a TV company is paying for them, all under huge pressure so that they will inevitably make mistakes, Lord Sugar can routinely insult them and dismiss one of them for anything that takes his fancy.
"You were disruptive"
"You were too quiet"
"You should have overruled the project manager"
"You should have supported the project manager"
"You didn't sell"
"I haven't seen very much of you" and if he has no real reason, but has to fire someone
"I've got an instinct we won't get on"
The latest task was as meaningless as the rest - create a "fashion house" by sketching out designs for three garments, concoct a name and logo and play a ridiculous game with real buyers for "how many units" of these non-existent brands they will "buy". Yes, I know I am using up an unsustainable amount of quotation marks but only in proportion to the ridiculousness [Sigh:Ed] of this method to assess whether the candidate is someone whose business warrants an investment.
Every episode features exactly the same elements:
- The candidates, who sleep jammed in a couple of rooms even though they have a twelve bedroom mansion at their disposal, are woken stupidly early in the morning by a phone call. The phone is not placed helpfully on the landing where they sleep. One of them has to go downstairs (filmed all the while, of course) to answer it. It is a different person each episode. Then, having been told where they are about to be taken and that the cars will be outside in 20 minutes (or maybe 40 minutes if they are having a lie-in), they must rush upstairs shouting "Guys, guys, wake up, we're going to Shoeburyness " (or whatever).
- There follows a minute of clips of young people washing, dressing and grooming before marching out of the house to climb into the four black taxis waiting outside. I have always assumed that they would wash, dress and groom anyway but the producers obviously feel this bit is terribly important and so they always show it.
- There follows some utterly pointless speculation about why they are going to Shoeburyness.
- They arrive, line up, face the grim faced Baroness Brady and the impassive Tim Campbell and await either the entrance of Sugar or his appearance on a TV screen.
- "Well, you might be wondering why you are here on the old winkle-picking pier at Shoeburyness" his lordship will say "Shoes are a very important part of the economy, we all wear them, the market is worth £500 billion and today you are going to design your own range of footwear, from sandals to slip-ons, from walking shoes to high-fashion dress shoes, plus Wellington boots, mountain climbing boots and football boots. Oh, and kids' shoes suitable both for school and the playground. You must then brand them, make a video and pitch it to industry experts and I'll see you back in the boardoom tonight where someone in the losing team will be fired" [A bit of exaggeration in this bit for heightened comic effect: Ed]
- The teams then choose a project manager and a subteam leader, discuss their assignment vaguely and then march back to the cars to begin a hectic schedule of designing, filming and pitching. The two parts of each team are kept separated and only permitted one short contact, via a phone call in which it is customary for each to despair at the other's interpretation of the brief. The phone must be held horizontal to the ground and not, as intended by mobile phone designers, to the ear where it works most efficiently.
- The tasks finish to the accompaniment (on-screen) of a musical soundtrack with an increasingly urgent tempo and are edited to make it impossible for the viewers to understand which team is doing better.
- The teams file into the "boardroom", where there are insufficient chairs so that some must stand awkwardly behind those who sit.
- Lord Sugar emerges and always begins his opening remarks with "Well". "Well, today's task was about selling guns to insurgents in central Africa" or "Well, I laid on for you to run a whelk stall in Scunthorpe"
- When he asks his trusted advisors to reveal the financial results, he starts with Baroness Brady who always replies "Erm, well, Alan". Sugar then always says "Tim, the same question to you"
- We know, from what past candidates have said, that the boardroom sessions last several hours and involve very close questioning of how the tasks were managed. But very little of this is shown in the programme. Instead we must endure Sugar's weak puns which he delivers as though he was the third understudy in a failing pantomime who has spent the last five minutes frantically trying to learn them backstage.
There is one episode each series which breaks out of this stifling mould. The 11th is always the interview stage and here, with the candidates finally forced to explain what their businesses are about and why they want Sugar's cash, in front of four very able and determined appraisers. Most fans will relish Claude Littner's "It's a bloody disgrace" demolition of Solomon Akhtar in 2014 as the pinnacle of the art, but my favourite moment was in 2022 when Mike Soutar asked Kathryn Burn about the web site that was a key part of her business, and if she owned it. The candidate was not sure. Mike was. He had bought it himself when his investigation showed that the candidate had failed to register it.
I'm not going to bother discussing the final. If Sugar hasn't already decided which candidate and plan he likes best after the preceding 11 episodes, then clearly it doesn't matter which he chooses. And if he has decided, then the final is a sham. Either way, it is for me the least interesting part of the process.
Is it worth sticking with the preceding 10 episodes to enjoy the demolition of the interviews? That is what we must ask ourselves. And each year I decide it is not but somehow, each year, I end up watching them anyway.